12/27/2023 0 Comments Daytona beach news journal amendment 3![]() ![]() Supreme Court decision in a New Jersey lawsuit cleared the way for the popular activity.Īllen said the tribe does not believe state lawmakers have to take any action to legalize sports betting in Florida for the compact to be valid.īut whether the compact complies with federal law isn’t the only legal landmine.įloridians in 2018 approved a constitutional amendment, known as Amendment 3, requiring statewide voter authorization of expansions of gambling. More than two-dozen other states have legalized sports betting since a 2018 U.S. Sprowls called the compact “a big deal” for the state. “One thing I’ve found in gaming … is that it’s all interconnected,” Sprowls, R-Palm Harbor, told reporters. House Speaker Chris Sprowls acknowledged that the deal is complex. Lawmakers, who finished their regular legislative session Friday, are set to address the compact and associated gambling-related bills when they come back to the Capitol for a special session during the week of May 17. That undermines what the state is intending to do here,” he said. “This is as open and shut case as it gets in gaming law, and it’s confounding, absolutely confounding to me that the state agreed to a deal that runs a significantly high risk of being modified or being pared back significantly … and leaving in its place a tribal monopoly with nothing for the pari-mutuel facilities. The Interior Department or the courts could wipe out other aspects of the sports-betting arrangement laid out in the compact, Wallach said. If courts found that the wagers could only take place on tribal lands, that could leave the Seminoles with exclusive rights to conduct sports betting in Florida, even if only at their casinos. And obviously if someone challenges that legally, then we’ll have to go through the process.” “I’ll reiterate we certainly respect there’s those who feel that’s not accurate, and we respect that but that’s our position. ![]() “Candidly, we would never enter into this agreement if we did not verify this with other legal representation, that the bet in the transaction happens at the server, and as long as that is on tribal sovereign lands, we think we are within the boundaries of the law,” he said. Wallach pointed to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which provides that tribes may conduct certain types of gambling activities “on tribal lands.” Courts have strictly interpreted the federal law to mean that the activities need to take place on tribal lands.Īllen noted that the tribe is “very aware of certain individuals or companies that would not like this particular contract approved, and we certainly respect that,” but he repeatedly said the wagering “transaction” would take place on tribal sovereign lands, The tribe would pay the state up to 14 percent on the net winnings.īut Wallach and others question whether federal law allows the state to enter into a compact that authorizes gambling off tribal lands, even if the technology handling wagering transactions is on the Seminoles’ property. Pari-mutuels would get to keep 60 percent of sports-betting revenue, with 40 percent going to the Seminoles. Under the agreement inked April 23 by DeSantis and Seminole Tribe of Florida chairman Marcellus Osceola Jr., the Seminoles would serve as a hub for online sports betting, with pari-mutuel operators contracting with the tribe. Wallach warned that the compact could result in a legal quagmire because of the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which governs what activities tribes can engage in. “Florida is a legal landmine,” Hallandale Beach lawyer Daniel Wallach, who specializes in sports betting, said in an interview. Other lawyers believe that the proposed compact with the Seminoles could run afoul of federal law. In addition, experts are divided about whether the Florida constitution requires statewide voter approval to legalize sports betting. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |